Talk:Weirdcyclopedia

Deletion
Since there appears to be a dispute over if this page should be deleted or not, I'm protecting it temporarily so that a discussion can be held. Each side should give valid and solid reasons why this page should/shouldn't be deleted. Remember to be civil at all times. Tali64^2 (talk) 11:44, 27 January 2023 (UTC)
 * To be honest, this wiki was bad from the start, many of the pages I've seen there were downright badly written and some of them had barely any content, and one page was even pure hypocrisy. this wiki is also poor in categories and templates, which makes this wiki bad at editing and keeping order, and when it comes to edit wars, even before this December when its only admin stopped being active at all and what SuperStreetKombat says, there was a whole the masses of edit wars and the community didn't even try to hide their toxicity by explicitly treating their opinions as facts, and at times I even saw some (while admittedly Zenko was innocent) literally wish death to her enemies. And since December last year, this wiki has become even worse than it was then for obvious reasons. One of our editors, whom I greet and consider a very kind person and constructive user, even stated that this wiki was created as a joke and that it is intentionally bad. As for SuperStreetKombat, almost all of its edits are nothing more than edit wars and opinions, which are mostly nothing more than complaining about something that has little if any impact on quality and also he is almost inactive on this wiki. Weirdyclopedia is bad in my opinion for the reasons stated on the page, and in my opinion, the only advantage of this wiki is the editing freedom, but even that seems questionable considering that it very, very often leads to edit wars and badly written pages. Szczypak 2005 13:15, January 27 2023 (GMT+2)
 * Also, I'd like to add that I have given a large amount of sources to back up my claims on this page I created pointing directly to the wiki itself, while SuperStreet gave absolutely no proof of its claims and its only excuse was that the wiki was "well received" for which he gave no proof and is apparently based on his own feelings. Szczypak 2005 13:27, January 27 2023 (GMT+2)